Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Country
-
Employer
- FEUP
- Universidade de Coimbra
- Associação do Instituto Superior Técnico para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento _IST-ID
- INESC TEC
- National Research Council Canada
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
- Instituto Superior Técnico
- University of Aveiro
- Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf - HZDR - Helmholtz Association
- Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra
- UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA
- University of Antwerp
- University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
- CESPU - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário CRL
- CIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research - Uporto
- Cardiff University
- DAAD
- Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P.
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge
- Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território da Universidade de Lisboa
- Johannes Kepler University
- NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)
- Princeton University
- University of Southern Queensland
- 16 more »
- « less
-
Field
-
experience in the project’s area – 5 points; in related areas – 2 points; outside the project’s area – 1 point. Candidates will be rated on a scale from 1 to 20 points. Candidates scoring below 13 points in
-
candidate is a strategic, collaborative and results-oriented leader who can operate in a complex, multi-stakeholder environment and who shares the NRC’s core values of Integrity, Excellence, Respect and
-
scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR: criterion 1 * (60%) + criterion 2 * (20%) + criterion 3 * (20%) = 100% - I: criterion 1 * (50
-
Article 12 of the Regulations for Grants of INESC TEC, while the second phase comprehends the Individual Interview (EI). All factors are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 100, taking into account the applicants
-
on the criteria referred to in Article 12 of the Regulations for Grants of INESC TEC, while the second phase comprehends the Individual Interview (EI). All factors are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 100, taking
-
parameters. VII.II- The evaluation of the criteria and the final classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR
-
(25%) VII.II- The evaluation of the criteria and the final classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR
-
TEC. 2. OBJECTIVES: - Broadening knowledge of the state of the art in the specific scientific field related to the fellowship; - Developing models and supporting the implementation of multi-aspect use
-
classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR: criterion 1 * 65% + criterion 2 * 35% = 100% - Final Classification (FC
-
final classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR: criterion 1 * (30%) + criterion 2 * (25%)+ criterion 3