Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Category
-
Employer
- University of Aveiro
- Universidade de Coimbra
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
- Instituto Superior Técnico
- Universty of Aveiro
- Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra
- INESC ID
- Instituto Superior de Agronomia
- Instituto de Telecomunicações
- International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL)
- NOVA.id.FCT- Associação para a Inovação de Desenvolvimento da FCT
- 1 more »
- « less
-
Field
-
Evaluation Method(s) Curricular evaluation weighted to 60% on a scale of 20 points with a minimum of 16 points needed for admission. Individual interview weighted to 40% on a scale of 20 points with a minimum
-
classification to the Portuguese grading scale (process regulated by Decree-Law no. 341/2007 of October 12), or alternatively, to obtain equivalence/recognition of the academic degrees (process regulated by
-
, spatial composition, and historical features; Quality control of technical outputs produced by the team, including maps, Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), viewshed analyses, and graphic landscape
-
supplemented by funding within the scope of the research project “Multi-year funding for R&D Units (UIDB/00690/2025)”, funded by national funds through the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)/Ministry of
-
- The evaluation of the criteria and the final classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR: criterion 1 * (20
-
classification will be based on a scale from 0 to 100, with scores rounded to the nearest hundredth, applying the following formulas: - AR: criterion 1 * 65% + criterion 2 * 35% = 100% - Final Classification (FC
-
battery technologies. Design and perform electrochemical studies of electrodes, electrolytes, and complete cell configurations. Conduct materials characterisation and correlate structure, composition, and
-
the doctorate (20%), - Experience in modeling and evaluation methods of ecosystem services (35%), - Experience in scientific and technical writing and publication (20%), - Motivation (25%). 10. Composition
-
evaluated based on: C1 (50%) CV of the candidate C2 (50%) Relevance of the candidate's profile to the position Each criteria, and the final classification F will be evaluated in a scale (0-20). The candidates
-
selection will be based on the following criteria: Academic Record; [60 %] Experience with Checkpoint/Restore Systems [40 %] The evaluation panel assigns a classification to each of the candidates on a scale